products, while 18% of respondents spend more
than $ 100 per month. The United States is home
to the world’s largest cosmetics and personal
care market. In 2019, its value was estimated at
approximately $ 93.35 billion up from $ 80.7
billion in 2015. Most of this market value is in the
hair and skin care segments (Average amount
consumers spend, 2019). Other studies show that
the average woman in the US spends about $
313 a month on her looks. This is up to $ 3,756
per year or $ 225,360 over a lifetime (McLintock,
2020). One of the reasons women spend huge
amounts of money on personal care (along with
skin needs and an obsession with cosmetics) is
due to social pressure.
The situation is just as serious in the beauty
market of the Far East. For example, in South
Korea physical beauty is associated with
superiority, as far as South Korea is a country of
hyper-competition for limited resources. Beautiful
appearance creates a competitive advantage
that helps in finding a job, choosing a partner,
achieving a higher social and financial status
(Luxen & Van De Vijver, 2006). Male dominance
in the East Asia region amplifies this
phenomenon. Gender discrimination in South
Korea has led to the objectification of women’s
bodies and desire to maximize social
competitive advantage through risky
appearance management such as cosmetic
surgery (Lim, 2004). A person who has a “culturally
appropriate” face and body is more likely to
access social resources. This leads to the fact
that women who do not meet these standards
consider themselves inferior, suffer from stress,
prejudice, and inequality (Kim & Lee, 2018;
Strahan et al., 2006).
Thus, unrealistic beauty standards have a
huge impact on women and their self-image.
Exposure to visual media depicting idealized
faces and bodies causes a negative or distorted
self-image (Grabe, Ward & Hyde, 2011). The new
globalized and homogenized beauty ideal
emphasizes youth and slimness. Over the past
few decades, the emphasis on this ideal has
been accompanied by an increase in the level
of dissatisfaction with their bodies among both
women and men (Tiggemann, 2004).
Though face and body image concerns are
not a mental health condition in themselves
(Mair, 2019), they have a negative impact on
women’s mental health being associated with
body dysmorphic disorder, social anxiety
disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic
disorder (Aderka et al., 2014), depression, eating
disorders, psychological distress, low self-esteem,
self-harm (Black, 2019; Octan, 2017), suicidal
feelings. For instance, “one in eight adults in the
UK have experienced suicidal thoughts or feelings
because of concerns about their body image”
(Mental Health Foundation, 2019). This situation is
becoming even more dangerous today, when
the COVID-19 pandemic has affected those
struggling with BDD (The Covid-19 Pandemic,
2020).
A philosopher and essayist S. Neiman in her
book “Why Grow Up?: Subversive Thoughts for an
Infantile Age” (2015) argues that the orientation of
the modern society on youth as the main value is
a disturbing symptom, since normal growing up is
perceived as a decline. By focusing on
consumption rather than satisfaction with work,
relationships, life in general, the world creates a
society of eternal adolescents. This is convenient
for the establishment, which, by satisfying the
material needs of people, distracts them from
something else, something deeper and more
important for the development of a human and
humankind. The cult of youth promotes control
over people who choose youth and beauty as a
main life goal mainly because of the need
imposed by society to meet established
standards for successful social functioning.
Although evolutionary biologists argue that
there are evolutionary reasons for using the
images of women of the most reproductive age
and men at the peak of their physical activity in
advertising, S. Neiman states that the goal of
humanity is not to maximize reproduction, no
matter what they talk about genes. Evolutionary
arguments fail to explain the enormous social
emphasis on youth. Debunking the
misconceptions about childhood as a state of
bliss and adulthood as an evidence of painful
experience, S. Neiman emphasizes that the state
of maturity is an ideal that is difficult to achieve,
but one must strive for it (2015).
These ideas resonate so closely with C.G.
Jung’s theory of the archetypes of the collective
unconscious and the individuation process. Within
the frame of Jungian terms, individuation means
the process of achieving self-realization by
bringing the individual and collective
unconscious into conscious – this is the
coherence of all components of the personality
that unites them into the one unified integral
system. C.G. Jung considered the reintegration of
the personality to be a necessary condition for
solving spiritual, social, ethical, and political
problems of humanity. Social health depends on
the health of individuals. As a psychiatrist and
psychoanalyst, C.G. Jung found that his patients
over the age of thirty-five were faced with the
problem of reintegration with a wider spiritual
reality (2017). According to the psychoanalyst,